Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2990 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $19.99 vs $210.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing New World than Core i5-13600K - $0.11 vs $1.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 41% better in New World than Core i3-4160 - 151 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 20 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
107
70.86092715231787%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
7.913669064748202%
Price, $
$210
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
39.9249530956848%
Multi-Core
2072
13.954741379310345%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |