Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1368 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $11.48 vs $189.0
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i3-4160 - 183 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 16 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $11.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
85.46184738955823%
Multi-Core
2072
33.8949779159169%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |