Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 3766 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 38% better in Rust than Core i3-350M - 203 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |