Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1062 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $25.7 vs $180.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700K - $0.22 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 35 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3240T - 133 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
115
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17891 minutes ago
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17892 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |