Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3290 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $70.0 vs $411.33
- Up to 75% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-12900F - $0.4 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 46% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3210 - 258 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 24 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8952 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
258
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
25%
Price, $
$411.33
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $411.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8961 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |