Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3556 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $70.0 vs $489.99
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 64% better in New World than Core i3-3210 - 162 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 32 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77107 minutes ago
Buy for $489.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
17.114996637525216%
Multi-Core
1018
5.052610680960889%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |