Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $70.0 vs $275.98
- Up to 69% better value when playing New World than Core i9-10900 - $0.71 vs $2.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 23% better in New World than Core i3-3210 - 122 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 20 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5912 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.26/FPS
31%
Price, $
$275.98
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |