Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1934 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $70.0 vs $184.0
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i3-3210 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76743 minutes ago
Buy for $184 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76745 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
40.88353413654618%
Multi-Core
1018
16.65303451660396%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |