Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2996 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $70.0 vs $179.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-11600K - $0.46 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3210 - 194 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3478 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
49%
Price, $
$179.99
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3479 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |