Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1677 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 3% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i3-3110M - 155 vs 150 FPS
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
155
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |