Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i3-2350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2656 days newer than Core i3-2350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 63% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-2350M - 360 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2350M - 6 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
360
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7687 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2350M | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |