Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Core i3-2350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 388 days newer than Core i3-2350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-2350M - 151 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2350M - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10611 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2350M | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |