Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Core i3-2350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 388 days newer than Core i3-2350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-2350M - 274 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2350M - 6 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
274
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2350M | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |