Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i3-2330M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3576 days newer than Core i3-2330M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2330M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 20% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-2330M - 206 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2330M - 8 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2072 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2330M | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |