Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3539 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4690S - 212 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $52.0 vs $119.98
- Up to 49% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-14100F - $0.29 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
50%
Price, $
$119.98
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $119.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i5-4690S |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |