Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1848 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 33% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3930T - 209 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $39.0 vs $83.62
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $83.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74997 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
24.629213483146067%
Multi-Core
948
12.712887220061686%
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |