Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4360 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2191 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4360.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4360 - 278 vs 271 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i3-4360 - $139.99 vs $149.88
- Up to 9% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-4360 - $0.5 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4360 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 54 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
278
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 886 minutes ago
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 880 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-4360 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |