Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $133.92 vs $187.24
- Up to 28% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-9600KF - $1.02 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-10320 - 132 vs 131 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
131
99%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$133.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $133.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
71%
Price, $
$187.24
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $187.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |