Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $199.06 vs $1399.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-13700F - $1.21 vs $7.57 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10300 - 185 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
165
89%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2072 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.57/FPS
15%
Price, $
$1399.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2072 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |