Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i3-10110U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 253 days newer than Core i3-10110U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10110U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Minecraft than Core i3-10110U - 736 vs 681 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10110U - 20 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
736
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10110U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |