Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Core i5-4670S - 276 vs 270 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $43.88 vs $73.5
- Up to 41% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10100 - $0.16 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
59.25925925925925%
Price, $
$73.5
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for $73.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
270
97.82608695652173%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1151
80.71528751753155%
Multi-Core
3254
77.20047449584816%
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |