Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 is 144 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 74% cheaper than FX-8350 - $49.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8350 - $0.55 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G550 - 91 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3661 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3661 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |