Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 2189 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $19.25 vs $385.0
- Up to 95% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-7940X - $0.07 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G540 - 294 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 28 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
272
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Buy for $385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |