Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 646 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 94% cheaper than FX-9590 - $19.25 vs $298.02
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G540 - 110 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76696 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76696 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
72.79411764705883%
Multi-Core
679
31.275909719023492%
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |