Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3229 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $19.25 vs $379.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.12 vs $2.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G540 - 189 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 24 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
165
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Buy for $379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |