Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $19.25 vs $120.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-10320 - $0.09 vs $0.46 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 19% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G540 - 262 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
221
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2471 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2471 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |