Buy on Amazon
$68.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 976 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $68.02 vs $180.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-6700K - $0.1 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 54 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 6% better in Rocket League than Celeron G4900 - 720 vs 680 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
680
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18551 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-6700K
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18552 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
