Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 471 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $39.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.27 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 17% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3930T - 168 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |