Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 177 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G3930T - 213 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 64 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
