Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2553 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 4% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-530 - 101 vs 97 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 51 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 37% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $40.0 vs $63.92
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74408 minutes ago
Buy for $40 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |