Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 1220 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3930 - 148 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $41.0 vs $63.92
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dead Space than Celeron G3930 - $0.28 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
145
97.97297297297297%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
63.63636363636365%
Price, $
$63.92
64%
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53115 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
61.10552763819096%
Multi-Core
1043
53.214285714285715%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |