Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8086K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8086K is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-8086K - $39.9 vs $449.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-8086K - $0.25 vs $2.35 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Performs up to 21% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3900 - 191 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
158
82.72251308900523%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5320 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.35/FPS
10.638297872340425%
Price, $
$449
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
34.72803347280335%
Multi-Core
992
14.226301448443998%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-8086K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 5th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 40th |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |