Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $39.9 vs $554.05
- Up to 93% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i9-9900T - $0.28 vs $3.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 4% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G3900 - 145 vs 140 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
140
96.55172413793103%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5949 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.82/FPS
7.329842931937174%
Price, $
$554.05
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $554.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5952 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
40.54431263084438%
Multi-Core
992
16.549883216549883%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |