Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 664 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $70.0 vs $445.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-7820X - $0.27 vs $1.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3900 - 275 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Buy for $445 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |