Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 605 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3240T - 111 vs 110 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
110
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 980 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |