Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2191 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1840 - 190 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |