Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2336 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $46.41 vs $150.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.28 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1820 - 179 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
166
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |