Buy on Amazon
$235
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1711 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 22% better in Rust than Celeron G1620 - 185 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 24 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14771 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
