Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-13900KS

Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-13900KS: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900KS

3.2 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900KS Logo
Intel Core i9-13900KS Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P + 16 E) 36MB Cache, up to 6.0 GHz

Buy for $575 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75961 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900KS

3.2 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900KS Logo
Intel Core i9-13900KS Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P + 16 E) 36MB Cache, up to 6.0 GHz

Buy for $575 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75961 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3692 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610

  • Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $37.0 vs $575.0
  • Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 55 vs 150 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS

  • Performs up to 46% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 166 vs 114 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Dying Light 2: Stay Human.
Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

114

68.67469879518072%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$37

100%

Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610

Buy for $37 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75960 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-13900KS Logo
Core i9-13900KS

Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023


FPS

166

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$575

6%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900KS Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P + 16 E) 36MB Cache, up to 6.0 GHz

Buy for $575 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75961 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

Intel Core i9-13900KS Logo
Core i9-13900KS

Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

426

13.719806763285025%

Multi-Core

739

3.384784500526725%

Intel Core i9-13900KS Logo
Core i9-13900KS

Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023


Single-Core

3105

100%

Multi-Core

21833

100%

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo

Intel Celeron G1610

vs
Intel Core i9-13900KS Logo

Intel Core i9-13900KS

Dec 3rd, 2012Release Date
Jan 12th, 2023
CeleronCollectionCore i9
Ivy BridgeCodenameRaptor Lake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
24
2Threads
32
2.6 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.2 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed6.0 GHz
55 W
TDP150 W
22 nmProcess Size
10 nm
26.0xMultiplier
32.0x
Intel HDIntegrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Celeron G1610 or Core i9-13900KS

Dying Light 2: Stay Human, 1920 x 1080, High Quality Raytracing

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.