Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 3042 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron B815 - 180 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |