Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4390 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 24% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron B815 - 385 vs 311 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
385
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$209.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8025 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |