Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3656 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 41% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron B815 - 121 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 12 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $143.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |