Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 3042 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron B815 - 165 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
![[Windows 11] Dell Inspiron 3891 Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B01DVTMAL8.jpg)
