Buy on Amazon
$270
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $107
Availability
MSRP in USD: $107
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 219 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron 3865U - 255 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 24 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
