Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1439 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron 2955U - 133 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 24 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |