Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 313 days older than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 48% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Celeron 2955U - 40 vs 27 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 8 vs 2 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
40
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |