Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2135 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron 2955U - 102 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2349 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |