Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2725 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 17 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 40% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron 1037U - 599 vs 427 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 24 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
599
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |