Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2359 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 17 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron 1037U - 220 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 24 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$395
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |