Buy on Amazon
$112.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 89 days older than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 23% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron 1000M - 48 vs 39 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 8 vs 2 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
48
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition FX-8300 3.3 GHz with 4.2 GHz Turbo Octa core Processor (FD8300WMHKBOX)
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10501 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
